The Thematic Working
Group (TWG) on Early School Leaving (ESL) met in Brussels on June 25th
and 26th. The group consists of delegates from EU member-states – representatives
from Ministries of Education and experts – as well as international experts
(OECD, EURYDICE). In addition several European NGOs (ETUCE, OBESSU, EPA, COFACE)
are represented. EPA’s delegate is former President Johannes Theiner
who was given the mandate to continue some of his activities.
The meeting was
dedicated to sum up the facts found and work on a report. As the European
Commission recently decided to change the working methodology some TWGs will be
reorganised. It was announced that in August a new structure will be proposed
by the DG EAC to make the work more effective and bring together related topics.
The report under
construction was intended to be a mid-term report and will now mark the closing
of this TWG. It has to be pointed out that only three out of six identified
topics had been discussed and elaborated up to now. The field “Parents and
Families” which is most relevant for EPA had been postponed.
There were discussions
about the report’s structure which will deal with Governance
in one chapter and Cross-Sectoral
Cooperation in the following one. Some of the representatives did
not see a reason to discuss these issues in two chapters.
On behalf of the
stakeholders in the system Johannes Theiner
claimed to have a clear statement on the need for “… participation of organisations
representing parents, students and teachers on all levels policy-discussions
and decisions”. He also argued in favour of dealing with issues in- and outside
the school system separately clarifying that parents, students and teachers (sometimes
called school-partners) are the “stakeholders”
in the system and governance needs to include their participatory rights and responsibilities.
Trans- or Cross-sectoral
co-operation was less an issue of vertical/subsidiary structures but required
new strategies for collaboration (co-ordination and co-operation) between hierarchic
structures like the health- and the social sector with the education system. This
included fields of decisive powers, financial resources and active
contribution. Co-operative strategies for planning, monitoring and evaluation
have to be developed. The term “stakeholders” has to be analysed differently
with respect to the players in the different segments.
Overall finalising this
report is still a big challenge. Some key topics have not yet been discussed
and the debate on the bare structure revealed that there is an unbalanced
diversity of models that can hardly be depicted in a single paper.
EPA has discussed the
topic in a sequence of workshops (2011, 2012 and 2013). Pierre Marraisse, head
of unit A at the Directorate General Education And
Culture (EAC) invited EPA to submit a comprised contribution from
all its member states to complement the state reports on ESL with the concerns
and experiences of parents.
EPA-members will
receive all relevant information available from the working group together with
a questionnaire or a similar tool to compile a “European Parents’ Report on ESL”
Johannes Theiner
EPA-Ambassador
EPA-Ambassador
No comments:
Post a Comment